The Impact of Regulation on Competition in Telecommunications and Piped Gas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23962/10539/20345Keywords:
competition analysis, competition regulation, market reviews, ex ante regulation, ex post regulation, telecommunications sector, piped gas sector, South AfricaAbstract
This article examines the ex ante powers to regulate competition bestowed on the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) in terms of the Electronic Communications Act, Act No 36 of 2005 (ECA) and on the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA) in terms of the Gas Act, Act No 48 of 2001 (Gas Act) and the regulators’ recent exercise of these powers to regulate prices in the mobile telecommunications and piped gas industries. Since 1999, the South African competition law authorities have focused on the reactive or ex post exercise of their statutory powers in terms of competition legislation, in order to detect and prosecute anti-competitive behaviour. This includes industries regulated by another sector regulator such as in the electronic communications sector (ICASA) and in the piped gas sector (NERSA). Several complaints against dominant suppliers in these industries have been successfully prosecuted in terms of the Competition Act, Act No 89 of 1998 (Competition Act). There have been far fewer efforts by the sector regulators to proactively exercise their ex ante regulatory powers in order to create a market structure and conditions that facilitate competition in the sectors that they regulate. In this article, we examine the recent exercise of powers by ICASA and NERSA in the mobile and piped gas industries. We conclude that the provisions of the ECA have facilitated (i) the identification and analysis of relevant markets lacking in adequate competition and (ii) the promulgation of regulation that is needed to develop a more competitive environment in due course. However, ICASA's process in exercising its statutory powers has been slow and has suffered from various deficiencies. On the other hand, the analysis indicates that the legislation governing NERSA’s ex ante powers, and the way in which NERSA has enforced that legislation, has led to counter-productive regulation, which has hindered competition in the sector. Accordingly amendments to the Gas Act are required. Amendments effected to the ECA retain guidance to the regulator on how to conduct a market review, but the regulator should exercise these powers more often.
References
Agreement concerning the Mozambique Gas Pipeline (MGPA), Government of the Republic of South Africa-Sasol (Pty) Limited, 2001.
Buiges, P. (2006, 30 October-2 November). Competition policy versus sector-specific regulation in network industries – the EU experience. Paper submitted to UNCTAD Seventh Session of the Intergovernmental Group of Experts on Competition Law and Policy, Geneva, Switzerland.
Cell C (2014). Answering affidavit filed in the case of Mobile Telephone Networks (Pty) Ltd v The Chairperson of the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa; Vodacom (Pty) Ltd v The Chairperson of the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (2014/04699, 2014/6710) [2014] ZAGPJHC 51; [2014] 3 All SA 171 (GJ) (31 March 2014).
Competition Tribunal (2011). Rules for the conduct of proceedings in the Competition Tribunal. Retrieved from http://www.comptrib.co.za/assets/Uploads/The-Act/Tribunal-Rules.pdf
Creamer, T. (2013, 18 October). Manufacturers turn to courts amid discontent over gas pricing, Sasol contract talks. Engineering News. Retrieved from http://www.engineeringnews.co.za/article/big-manufacturers-turn-to-courts-amid-unhappiness-with-gas-pricing-sasol-contract-talks-2013-10-18
De Streel, A. (2008). The relationship between competition law and sector specific regulation: The case of electronic communications. Reflets & Perpectives de la Vie Economique, XLVII(1), 55-72. http://doi.org/10.3917/rpve.471.0055
Dewenter, R. & Kruse, J. (2010). Calling party pays or receiving party pays? The diffusion of mobile telephony with endogenous regulation. DICE Discussion Paper, No. 10. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2010.09.002
Dymond, A. (2004). Telecommunications challenges in developing countries: Asymmetric interconnection charges for rural areas. World Bank Working Paper 7. Washington: World Bank. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.orgEXTINFORMATIONANDCOMMUNICATIONANDTECHNOLOGIES/Resources/Asymmetric_Interconnection_Dymond.pdf
European Union (EU) (2002). Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services. Official Journal L 108. Available at http://eurlex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32002L0021
ICASA (2007a). Notice 78: Electronic Communications Act No. 36 of 2005: Intention to define relevant wholesale call termination markets in terms of Section 67(4) of the Electronic Communications Act 36 of 2005. Government Gazette No. 29568.
ICASA (2007b). Notice 1627: Independent Communications Authority of South Africa Act No. 13 of 2000: Findings: Wholesale call termination market definition process. Government Gazette No. 30449.
ICASA (2009). Notice 1367: Independent Communications Authority of South Africa Act No. 13 of 2000: Findings: Wholesale call termination market definition process: Questionnaire to evaluate effectiveness of competition in call termination market. Government Gazette No. 32628.
ICASA (2010a). Notice 314: Electronic Communications Act (36/2005): ’Call termination regulations’ pursuant to section 67(4) of the Electronic Communications Act No. 36 of 2005. Government Gazette No. 33121.
ICASA (2010b). Notice 1015: Electronic Communications Act (36/2005): ‘Call termination regulations’ pursuant to section 67(4) of the Electronic Communications Act No. 36 of 2005. Government Gazette No. 33698.
ICASA (2010c). Explanatory note to the draft call termination regulations. Retrieved from https://www.icasa.org.za/portals/0/Call%20Termination%20Explanatory%20note%20to%20the%20Draft%20Call%20Termination%20Regulations%20Final%2020131004.pdf
ICASA (2011). Notice 346: Electronic Communications Act No. 36 of 2005: ICASA regulatory framework for broadcasting transmission services: Discussion paper for comment. Government Gazette No. 34371.
ICASA (2013a). Notice 574: ICASA Act (13/2000): Notice of intention to implement a cost to communicate programme. Government Gazette No. 36532.
ICASA (2013b). Notice 1018: Electronic Communications Act (36/2005): Draft call termination regulations. Government Gazette No. 36919.
ICASA (2014). Notice 65: Electronic Communications Act (36/2005): Call termination regulations, 2014. Government Gazette No. 37295.
ICN (n.d.). Merger review: An overview of the analytical framework utilised in South Africa. International Competition Network. Retrieved from http://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/uploads/library/doc336.pdf
ICN (2004). Antitrust enforcement in regulated sectors working group: Interrelations between antitrust and regulatory authorities. Report to the Fourth ICN Annual Conference. Retrieved from http://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/uploads/library/doc381.pdf
ITU (2003). Botswana mini case study: Recent experience in interconnection disputes. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Available from http://www.imaginar.org/sites/ict_toolkit/files/2623_file_Botswana_Mini_Case_Study_Interconnection.pdf
Joskow, P. (2007). Regulation of natural monopolies. In A.M. Polinsky & S. Shavell (Eds.), Handbook of Law and Economics, Vol. 2 (pp. 1227-1348). Oxford: Elsevier. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0730(07)02023-1
Kalba, K. (2008). The adoption of mobile phones in emerging markets: Global diffusion and the rural challenge. International Journal of Communication,2, 631-661. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/216/179
Lazauskaite, V. (2009). Mobile termination rates – to regulate or not to regulate? GSR Discussion Paper. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/ITU-D/treg/Events/Seminars/GSR/GSR09/doc/GSR09_Lazauskaite_MTRs.pdf
Moodaliyar, K. & Weeks, K. (2009, 3-4 September). A framework for promoting competition in electronic communications: Clarifying the role of the competition authority and the sector regulator. Paper presented at Third Annual Competition Conference organised by the Competition Commission of South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Motta, M. (2004). Competition policy: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
NERSA (2010). Methodology to approve maximum prices for piped gas consultation document. Pretoria: National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA). Retrieved from http://www.nersa.org.za/Admin/Document/Editor/file/Piped%20Gas/Consultations/Document/Consultation%20document%20on%20Methodology%20to%20approve%20maximum%20price%20of%20Gas%20in%20the%20Piped-Gas%20industry.pdf
NERSA (2011a). Methodology to approve maximum prices of piped gas in South Africa. Pretoria: National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA). Retrieved from http://www.nersa.org.za
NERSA (2011b). Determination of the inadequate competition in the piped-gas industry as contemplated in Chapters 2 and 3 of the Competition Act, 1988. Pretoria: National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA). Retrieved from http://www.nersa.org.za/Admin/Document/Editor/file/Piped%20Gas/Consultations/Document/Discussion%20Document_%20Determination%20of%20the%20inadequate%20competition%20in%20the%20piped-gas%20industry.pdf
NERSA (2012a). Market value pricing explanatory notes. Pretoria: National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA). Retrieved from http://www.nersa.org.za/Admin/Document/Editor/file/Piped%20Gas/Consultations/Document/Explanatory%20Note%20on%20Market%20Value%20Pricing%20(MVP)%20Principle.pdf
NERSA (2012b). Maximum gas prices in terms of section 21(1) (p) for the period 26 March 2014 to 30 June 2017). Pretoria: National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA). Retrieved from http://www.nersa.org.za/Admin/Document/Editor/file/Piped%20Gas/Consultations/Document/Sasol%20Gas%20Maximum%20Prices%20Application%20for%202014%20to%202017.pdf
NERSA (2012c). Consultation document regarding maximum price of piped gas preliminary assessment for Sasol Gas for the period 26 March 2014 to 30 June 2017. Pretoria: National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA). Retrieved from http://www.nersa.org.za/Admin/Document/Editor/file/Piped%20Gas/Consultations/Document/Consultation%20document%20regarding%20the%20maximum%20prices%20of%20piped%20gas%20preliminary%20assessment%20for%20Sasol%20Gas%20for%20%202014%20to%202017.pdf
NERSA (2013). 2012/2013 Annual Report. Pretoria: National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA). Retrieved from http://www.nersa.org.za/Admin/Document/Editor/file/News%20and%20Publications/Publications/Current%20Issues/NERSA%20Annual%20Report%202012-2013.pdf
OECD (2012). Developments in mobile termination, OECD Digital Economy Papers No.193. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/developments-in-mobile-termination_5k9f97dxnd9r-en
RSA (2005). Notice 364: Electronic Communications Act, No 36 of 2005. Government Gazette No. 28743.
RSA (2013). Notice 443: Gas Amendment Bill, 2013: For public comment. Government Gazette No. 36425.
RSA (2014). Notice 266: Electronic Communications Amendment Act, No. 1 of 2014. Government Gazette No. 37536.
Schwarcz, S. (2011). Chapman Dialogue and Law Review Symposium keynote address: Ex ante versus ex post approaches to financial regulation, 15, Chapman Law Review, 257-269.
Steyn, L. (2014). Gas regulation leaves users fuming. Mail and Guardian. Retrieved from http://mg.co.za/article/2014-03-27-gas-regulation-leaves-users-fuming
Theron, N., & Binge, L. (2014, 4-5 September). The interface between competition and sector-specific regulation in the telecommunications industry: The case of mobile termination rates (MTRs). Paper presented at the Eighth Annual Conference on Competition Law, Economics and Policy, Sandton, Johannesburg.
Tye, W., & Lauperta, C. (1996). Economics of pricing network interconnection: Theory and application to the market for telecommunications in New Zealand. The Yale Journal on Regulation, 13, 419-500.
Vogelsang, I. (2003). Price regulation of access to telecommunications networks. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(3), 830-862. http://doi.org/10.1257/002205103322436205
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
- Abstract 286
- pdf 139
.png){kind=spacer}