Indigenous Peoples, Data Sovereignty and Self-Determination: Current Realities and Imperatives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23962/10539/30360Abstract
This study explores the current state and dynamics of the global Indigenous data sovereignty movement-the movement pressing for Indigenous peoples to have full control over the collection and governance of data relating to their lived realities. The article outlines the movement's place within the broader push for Indigenous self-determination; examines its links to big data, open data, intellectual property rights, and access and benefit-sharing; details a pioneering assertion of data sovereignty by Canada's First Nations; outlines relevant UN and international civil society processes; and examines the nascent movement in Africa. The study identifies a fundamental tension between the objectives of Indigenous data sovereignty and those of the open data movement, which does not directly cater for Indigenous peoples' full control over their data. The study also identifies the need for African Indigenous peoples to become more fully integrated into the global Indigenous data sovereignty movement.
References
Alfred, T., & Corntassel, J. (2005). Being Indigenous: Resurgences against contemporary colonialism. Government and Opposition, 40(4), 597–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2005.00166.x
Amani, B., & Coombe, R. (2005). The Human Genome Diversity Project: The politics of patents at the intersection of race, religion, and research ethics. Law C Policy, 27(1), 152–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2004.00195.x
American Indian Law Centre. (1999). Model tribal research code (with materials for tribal regulation for research and checklist for Indian Health Boards) (3rd ed.). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico.
Anaya, J. (2004). Indigenous peoples in international law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195173499.001.0001
Animikii Indigenous Technology. (2019, June 7). Decolonizing digital: Contextualizing Indigenous data sovereignty. https://www.animikii.com/news/decolonizing-digi-tal-contextualizing-indigenous-data-sovereignty
Blair, N. (2015). Researched to death: Indigenous peoples talkin’ up our experiences of research. International Review of Qualitative Research, 8(4), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2015.8.4.463
Borrows, J. (2017). Policy paper: Implementing Indigenous self-determination through legislation in Canada. Assembly of First Nations (AFN). https://www.afn.ca/wp-con-tent/uploads/2018/09/2017-04-20-Implementing-Indigenous-self-determina-tion-through-policy-legislation.pdf
Brower, V. (1997). From human rights to the human genome – stopping biopiracy. Nature Medicine, 3(10), 1056. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1097-1056b
Corrales, M., Fenwick, M., & Forgó, N. (Eds.). (2017). New technology, big data and the law. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5038-1
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. (2019). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television and New Media, 20(4), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632
Crawhall, N. (2011). Africa and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. The International Journal of Human Rights, 15(1), 11–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2011.529687
Dagne, T. (2020). Embracing the data revolution for development: A data justice framework for farm data in the context of African Indigenous farmers. The Journal of Law, Social Justice and Global Development, 25. https://doi.org/10.31273/LGD.2019.2502
Dalton, J. E. (2005). International law and the right of Indigenous self-determination: Should international norms be replicated in the Canadian context? Queen’s Institute for Intergovernmental Relations Working Paper No 1. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.932467
Davies, T., Walker, S., Rubinstein, M., & Perini, F. (Eds.). (2019). The state of open data: His- tories and horizons. African Minds and International Development Research Centre (IDRC). https://doi.org/10.47622/9781928331957
Ermine, W., Sinclair, R., & Jeffery, B. (2004). The ethics of research involving Indigenous peoples. Report of the Indigenous Peoples’ Health Research Centre to the Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. https://www.researchgate.net/publica-tion/317055157_The_Ethics_of_Research_Involving_Indigenous_Peoples
First Nations Information Governance Centre (FNIGC). (n.d.). OCAP. https://fnigc.ca/ocap
FNIGC. (2016). Pathways to First Nations’ data and information sovereignty. In T. Kuku- tai, & J. Taylor (Eds.), Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda (pp. 139–155). ANU Press.
FNIGC. (2020). A First Nations data governance strategy. https://fnigc.inlibro.net/cgi-bin/koha/opac-retrieve-file.pl?id=9c677f3dcf8adbf18fcda96c6244c459
Geomatics and Cartographic Research Centre (GCRC), & Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC). (2016). A proposal: An open licensing scheme for traditional knowledge. https://cippic.ca/sites/default/files/file/CIPPIC_GCRC--TK_License_Proposal--July_2016.pdf
Gilbert, J. (2011). Indigenous peoples’ human rights in Africa: The pragmatic revolution of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 60(1), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589310000746
Gilbert, J., & Lennox, C. (2019). Towards new development paradigms: The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples as a tool to support self-determined development. International Journal of Human Rights, 23(1–2), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2018.1562921
Global Indigenous Data Alliance (GIDA). (2019). CARE principles for Indigenous data governance. https://www.gida-global.org/care
GIDA. (n.d.). History of Indigenous data sovereignty. https://www.gida-global.org/histo-ry-of-indigenous-data-sovereignty
GO FAIR Initiative. (n.d.). FAIR principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/
Goodman, A., Morgan, R., Kuehlke, R., Kastor, S., Fleming, K., Boyd, J., & Aboriginal Harm Reduction Society (2018). “We’ve been researched to death”: Exploring the research experiences of urban Indigenous Peoples in Vancouver, Canada. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 9(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2018.9.2.3
Government of Canada. (2018). Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS) 2 - Chapter 9: Research Involving First Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples of Canada. Government of Canada Panel on Research Ethics. https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/tcps2-eptc2_2018_chapter9-chapitre9.html
Harding, A., Harper, B., Stone, D., O’Neill, C., Berger, P., Harris, S., & Donatuto, J. (2012). Conducting research with tribal communities: Sovereignty, ethics, and data-sharing issues. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103904
Indigenous Peoples Major Group for Sustainable Development (IPMG). (n.d.). https://in-digenouspeoples-sdg.org/index.php/english/
IPMG. (2015). Indigenous Peoples Major Group position paper on proposed SDG indicators. https://www.indigenouspeoples-sdg.org/index.php/english/all-resources/ipmg-po-sition-papers-and-publications/ipmg-reports
International Indigenous Data Sovereignty Interest Group (IDSIG). (2017). International Indigenous Data Sovereignty IG Charter Statement. https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/international-indigenous-data-sovereignty-ig/case-statement/internation-al-indigenous-data
Indigenous Navigator. (n.d.). [Website]. https://nav.indigenousnavigator.com/index.php/en/
Kukutai, T., & Taylor, J. (2016). Data sovereignty for indigenous peoples: Current practice and future needs. In T. Kukutai & J. Taylor (Eds.), Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda (pp. 1–22). ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.01
Lauriault, T. P. (2017). Critical data studies, smart cities and precision farming. Presentation to CIPPIC Summer Seminar Series, delivered at the University of Ottawa, 16 May. Unpublished.
Lefèvre, T. (2018). Big data in forensic science and medicine. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 57, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.08.001
Lovett, R., Lee, V., Kukutai, T., Cormack, D., Rainie, S. C., & Walker, J. (2019). Good data practices for Indigenous data sovereignty and governance. In A. Daly, S. K. Devitt, & M. Mann (Eds.), Good data (pp. 26-36). Institute of Network Cultures. https://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/handle/10289/12919
Marx, L., & Smith, M. R. (Eds.). (1994). Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism. MIT Press.
McMahon, R., LaHache, T., & Whiteduck, T. (2015). Digital data management as Indigenous resurgence in Kahnawà:ke. International Indigenous Policy Journal 6(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2015.6.3.6
Oguamanam, C. (2004). Indigenous peoples and international law: The making of a regime. Queen’s Law Journal, 30, 348–399.
Oguamanam, C., & Jain, V. (2017). Access and benefit sharing, Canadian and Aboriginal research ethics policy after the Nagoya Protocol: Digital DNA and transformations in biotechnology. Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 3(1), 79–112.
Oguamanam, C. (2018). ABS: Big data, data sovereignty and digitization: A new Indigenous research landscape. In C. Oguamanam, (Ed.), Genetic resources, justice and reconcilia- tion: Canada and global access and benefits sharing (pp. 196–211). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108557122.012
Oguamanam, C. (2019). Indigenous data sovereignty: Retooling Indigenous resurgence for development. CIGI Papers No. 234. Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3997388
Omwoyo, B. A. (2014). A critical evaluation of the regime for protection of Indigenous peoples’ rights under international human rights law. https://www.academia.edu/11648613
Open African Innovation Research (Open AIR). (n.d.). [Website]. https://openair.africa/Open Data Charter. (2015). International Open Data Charter. https://opendatacharter.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/opendatacharter-charter_F.pdf
Open North, & British Columbia First Nations Data Governance Initiative (BCFNDGI). (2017). Decolonizing data: Indigenous data sovereignty primer. http://bcfndgi.square-space.com/s/Decolonizing-Data-FN_DATA_SOVEREIGNTY_PAPER.docx
Porro, N. M., Neto, J. S., & Porro, R. (2015). Traditional communities as “subjects of rights” and the commoditization of knowledge in Brazil. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 6(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2015.6.2.8
Rainie, S. C., Kukutai, T., Walter, M., Figueroa-Rodriguez, O. L., Walker, J., & Axelsson, P. (2019). Issues in open data: Indigenous data sovereignty. In T. Davies, S. Walker, M. Rubinstein, & F. Perini (Eds.), The state of open data: Histories and horizons (pp. 300– 319). African Minds and International Development Research Centre (IDRC). https://www.idrc.ca/en/book/state-open-data-histories-and-horizons
Robinson, D. F. (2010). Confronting biopiracy: Challenges, cases and international debates. Rout- ledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849774710
Robinson, D. F. (2014). Biodiversity, access and benefit-sharing: Global case studies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315882819
Robinson, D. F., Abdel-Latif, A., & Roffe, P. (Eds.). (2017). Protecting traditional knowledge: The WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315666358
Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP). (1996). Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. Report to the Government of Canada.
Santos, L. (2008). Genetic research in Native communities. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 2(4), 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.0.0046
Schultz, J. L., & Rainie, S. C. (2014). The strategic power of data: A key aspect of sovereignty. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 5(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2014.5.4.1
Smith, M. L., & Seward, R. K. (Eds.). (2020). Making open development inclusive: Lessons from IDRC research. MIT Press and International Development Research Centre (IDRC). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11635.001.0001
Snipp, C. M. (2016). What does data sovereignty imply: What does it look like? In T. Ku- kutai, & J. Taylor (Eds.), Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda (pp. 39–55). ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.03
Sterling, R. L. (2011). Genetic research among the Havasupai: A cautionary tale. AMA Jour- nal of Ethics, 13(2), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2011.13.2.hlaw1-1102
Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL). (n.d.). About TKDL. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India. http://www.tkdl.res.in/tkdl/langdefault/common/Abouttkdl.asp?GL=Eng
UN. (1992). Convention on Biological Diversity. https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf UN. (2007a). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), A/RES/61/295. https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/decla-ration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples.html
UN. (2007b). Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (EMRIP), UNHRC Res 6/36, UNHRCOR, Sixth Session. UN document A/HRC/6/36.
UN. (2010). Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing. https://www.cbd.int/abs/
UN. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, A/RES/70/1. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingour-world/publication
UN General Assembly. (2014). Outcome Document of the High-Level Plenary Meeting of the General Assembly known as the World Conference on Indigenous Peoples, GA Resolution 69/2, UNGA 99th Session. Supplement No. 49, UN document A/ RES/69/2.
UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII). (2004). Report of the workshop on data collection and disaggregation for indigenous peoples. For UNPFII Third Session, New York, 10–21 May. UN document E/C.19/2004/2. https://undocs.org/E/C.19/2004/2
UNPFII. (2006). Report of the meeting on indigenous peoples and indicators of well-being. For UNPFII Fifth Session. UN document E/C.19/2006/CRP.3. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/workshop_indic_report.doc
Wilkinson, M., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A. … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stew- ardship. Scientific Data, 3, Article 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
- Abstract 1161
- pdf 818
.png){kind=spacer}