Towards a Tiered or Differentiated Approach to Protection of Traditional Knowledge (TK) and Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs) in Relation to the Intellectual Property System

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23962/10539/27533

Keywords:

Indigenous Peoples and local communities (IPLCs), genetic resources (GRs), traditional knowledge (TK), traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), tiered or differentiated approach, intellectual property (IP), World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (IGC)

Abstract

The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) has, for nearly two decades, engaged in formulating the nature and content of a text-based legal instrument or instruments for the effective protection of genetic resources (GRs), traditional knowledge (TK), and traditional cultural expressions (TCEs, also known as folklore) within or relating to the international intellectual property (IP) system. This task has been the job of WIPO’s Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (IGC), established in 2000. In this article, I explore the context and rationales for, and evolution of, one of the IGC’s evolving contributions: development of a tiered or differentiated approach to the protection of TK and TCEs. The article discusses and analyses the empirical ramifications and challenges of the tiered approach-alternatively referred to as differentiated approach—with reference to examples of forms of TK and TCE in Africa, North America and Australia. I conclude that the approach is a work in progress, still evolving, which provides a useful broad policy framework at the international level while, at the same time, its details are contingent on many considerations better addressed at national and local levels.

References

Primary sources

Anaya, J. S.(2016).Technical Review of Key Intellectual Property-Related Issues of the WIPO Draft Instruments on Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions by Professor James Anaya (December 6, 2016). WIPO/GRTKF/IC/33/INF/9. Information document submitted by the Secretariat of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. For IGC Thirty-Third Session, Geneva, February 27 to March 3, 2017. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=360462

Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). (2010). The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/abs

CBD. (n.d.) Article 15: Access to Genetic Resources. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/convention/articles/default.shtml?a=cbd-15

CBD. (n.d.). Bonn Guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-bonn-gdls-en.pdf

CBD. (n.d.). Article 8(j): Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/traditional

Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO). (2001). International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/plant-treaty/en/

Hardison, P. (2016). Response to WIPO Indigenous Panel on Outstanding/Pending Issues in the IGC Draft Articles on the Protection of Traditional Knowledge: Indigenous Peoples’ and Local Communities’ Perspectives (November 28, 2016). IGC Thirty-Second Session, Geneva, November 28 to December 2, 2016 (on file with author).

Intergovernmental Committee (IGC). (n.d.). World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO). Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/tk/en/igc

McCook, W. (2014a). Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions: Certain Suggested Cross-Cutting Issues – Non-Paper Prepared by the IGC Chair, His Excellency, Ambassador Wayne McCook. For IGC Twenty-Seventh Session, March 24 to April 4, 2014. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/tk/en/igc/pdf/igc_27_issues.pdf

McCook, W. (2014b). Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions: Certain Suggested Cross-Cutting Issues (March 12, 2014). WIPO/GRTKF/IC/INF/10. Document prepared by the Chair of the Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore, His Excellency, Ambassador Wayne McCook. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=269068

Milpurrurru v Indofurn Pty Ltd [1994] 130 ALR 659 (Federal Court of Appeal) (Austl.).

Standing Committee on the Law of Patents. (n.d.). Website. World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO). Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/policy/en/scp/

UN. (1992). Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/convention

World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO). (2014a). Report ( July 2, 2014). WIPO/ GRTKF/IC/27/10. IGC Twenty-Seventh Session, Geneva, March 24-April 4, 2014. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_grtkf_ic_27/wipo_grtkf_ic_27_10.pdf

WIPO. (2014b). The Protection of Traditional Knowledge: Draft Articles ( June 2, 2014). WIPO/GRTKF/IC/28/5. For IGC Twenty-Eighth Session, Geneva, July 7 to 9, 2014. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_grtkf_ic_28/wipo_grtkf_ic_28_5.pdf

WIPO. (2014c). The Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions: Draft Articles ( June 2, 2014). WIPO/GRTKF/IC/28/6. For the IGC Twenty-Eighth Session, Geneva, July 7 to 9, 2014, Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_grtkf_ic_28/wipo_grtkf_ic_28_5.pdf

WIPO. (2014b). The Protection of Traditional Knowledge: Draft Articles ( June 2, 2014). WIPO/GRTKF/IC/28/5. Prepared for the IGC Twenty-Eighth Session, Geneva, July 7 to 9, 2014, Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_grtkf_ic_28/wipo_grtkf_ic_28_5.pdf

WIPO. (2015). Matters Concerning the Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore. Agenda Item 17, Assemblies of Member States of WIPO Fifty-Fifth Session, October 5 to 14, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/tk/en/igc/pdf/igc_mandate_1617.pdf

WIPO. (2016a). Report (September 23, 2016). Thirtieth Session Geneva, May 30 to June 3, 2016. WIPO/GRTKF/IC/30/10 Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_grtkf_ic_31/wipo_grtkf_ic_31_ref_30_10.pdf

WIPO. (2016b). The Protection of Traditional Knowledge: Draft Articles, Rev. 2 (in Annexure) (October 3, 2016). WIPO/GRTKF/IC/32/4. For IGC Thirty-Second Session, Geneva, November 28 to December 2, 2016. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_grtkf_ic_32/wipo_grtkf_ic_32_4.pdf

WIPO. (2016c). Informal Briefing Notes: Perspectives and Experiences on Tiered Approach to the Protection of Traditional Knowledge: Scope of Protection, Exceptions and Limitations (November 3, 2016) (on file with author). WIPO. (2017a). The Protection of Traditional Knowledge: Draft Articles (March 15, 2017). WIPO/GRTKF/IC/34/5. For IGC Thirty- Fourth Session, Geneva, June 12-16, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=368218

WIPO. (2017b). The Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions: Draft Articles ( June 15, 2017). WIPO/GRTKF/IC/34/8. IGC Thirty-FourthSession, Geneva, June 12-16, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_grtkf_ic_34/wipo_grtkf_ic_34_8.pdf

WIPO. (2018a). The Protection of Traditional Knowledge: Draft Articles ( June 26, 2018). WIPO/GRTKF/IC/37/4. For IGC Thirty-Seventh Session, Geneva, August 27 to 31, 2018. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_grtkf_ic_37/wipo_grtkf_ic_37_4.pdf

WIPO. (2018b). The Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions: Draft Articles ( June 27, 2018). WIPO/GRTKF/IC/37/5. Drafted for IGC Thirty-Seventh Session, Geneva, August 27 to 31, 2018. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=409623

WIPO. (n.d.a). Draft substantive Patent Law Treaty. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/patent-law/en/draft_splt.htm

WIPO. (n.d.b). Case for support: Promoting effective participation of indigenous and local communities. WIPO Voluntary Fund for Accredited Indigenous and Local Communities. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/tk/en/igc/pdf/flyer_vol_fund.pdf

Secondary sources

Adewopo, A., Chuma-Okoro, H., & Oyewuni, A. (2014). A consideration of communal trademarks for Nigerian leather and textile products. In J. De Beer, C. Armstrong, C. Oguamanam, & T. Schonwetter (Eds.), Innovation and intellectual property: Collaborative dynamics in Africa (pp. 109–131. Cape Town: UCT Press.

Akinbogun, T. L., & Ogunduyile, S. R. (2009). Crafts engagement in the economic survival of South-Western Nigerian rural women. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 3(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506200910960897

Anaya, J. S. (2004). Indigenous peoples in international law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195173499.001.0001

Arewa, O. B. (2004). Piracy, biopiracy, and borrowing: Culture, heritage, and the globalization of intellectual property. Case Research Paper Series in Legal Studies. Working Paper No. 04-19. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=596921

Arezzo, E. (2007). Struggling around the natural divide: The protection of tangible and intangible Indigenous property. Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.927991

Bala, A. (2011). Traditional knowledge and intellectual property rights: An Indian perspective. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1954924

Battiste, M. (Ed.) (2000). Reclaiming Indigenous voices and vision. Vancouver: UBC Press.

Blakeney, M. (1995). Milpurrurru & Ors v Indofurn & Ors: Protecting expressions of Aboriginal folklore under copyright law. Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, 2(1).

Boateng, B. (2011). The copyright thing doesn’t work here: Adinkara and Kente cloth and intellectual property in Ghana. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816670024.001.0001

Brown, M. F. (1998). Can culture be copyrighted? Current Anthropology, 39(2), 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1086/204721

Brown, M. F. (2004). Who owns native culture? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Coombe, R. J. (1998a). The cultural life of intellectual properties: Authorship, appropriation and the law. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822382492

Coombe, R. J. (1998b). Intellectual property, human rights and sovereignty: New dilemmas in international law posed by the recognition of Indigenous knowledge and the conservation of biological diversity. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 6(1), 59–115.

De Beer, J., Oguamanam, C., & Schonwetter, T. (2014). Innovation, intellectual property, and development narratives in Africa. In J. De Beer, C. Armstrong, C. Oguamanam, & T. Schonwetter (Eds.), Innovation and intellectual property: Collaborative dynamics in Africa (pp. 1–31). Cape Town: UCT Press.

De Sousa Santos, B. (Ed.) (2007). Another knowledge is possible: Beyond Northern epistemologies. London: Verso.

De Sousa Santos, B., Nunes, J. A., & Meneses, M. P. (2007). Introduction: Opening up the canon of knowledge and recognition of difference. In B. De Sousa Santos (Ed.) (2007). Another knowledge is possible: Beyond Northern epistemologies (pp. xxix–lxii). London: Verso.

Elahi, S., & De Beer, J., (2013). Knowledge and innovation in Africa: Scenarios for the future. With D. Kawooya, C. Oguamanam, N. Rizk, and the Open AIR Network. University of Cape Town and University of Ottawa: Open African Innovation Research (Open AIR).

Helfer, L. H. (2004). Regime shifting: The TRIPS Agreement and new dynamics of international intellectual property lawmaking. Yale Journal of International Law, 29(1), 1–83. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.459740

Jayangakula, K. (n.d.). The protection of the expression of folklore and copyright law. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/3423284/The_Protection_of_the_Expression_of_Folklore_and_Copyright_Law

Konadu, K. B. (2007). Indigenous medicine and knowledge in African society. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203941393

Kuruk, P. (1999). Protecting folklore under modern intellectual property regimes: A reappraisal of the tensions between individual and communal rights in Africa and the United States. American University Law Review, 48(4), 769–849.

Maiwada, S., Dutsenwai, S. A., & Waziri, M. Y. (2012). Cultural industries and wealth creation: The case of traditional textile industry in Nigeria. American Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(5), 159–165.

Maskus, K. E., & Reichman, J. H. (2004). The globalization of private knowledge goods and the privatization of global public goods. Journal of International Economic Law, 7(2), 279–230. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/7.2.279

Maskus, K. E., & Reichman, J. H. (Eds.) (2005). International public goods and transfer of technology under a globalized intellectual property regime. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494529

May, C., & Sell, S. (2005). Intellectual property rights: A critical history. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781626370029

Memmi, A. (1990). The colonizer and the colonized. London: Earthscan.

Mgbeoji, I. (2001). Patents and traditional knowledge of the uses of plants: Is a communal patent regime part of the solution to the scourge of bio piracy? Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 9(1), 163–186.

Mgbeoji, I. (2006). Global biopiracy: Patents, plants, and Indigenous knowledge. Vancouver: UBC Press. https://doi.org/10.59962/9780774851701

Mutua, M. (2011). Savages, victims, and saviors: The metaphor of human rights. Harvard Law Review, 412(1), 201–244.

Oguamanam, C. (2007). Agro-biodiversity and food security: Biotechnology and traditional agricultural practices at the periphery of international intellectual property regime complex. Michigan State Law Review, 2007, 215–255.

Oguamanam, C. (2008). Local knowledge as trapped knowledge: Intellectual property, culture, power and politics. Journal of World Intellectual Property, 11(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2008.00333.x

Oguamanam, C. (2012). Intellectual property in global governance: A development question. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807040

Oguamanam, C. (2014). Indigenous Peoples’ rights at the intersection of human rights and intellectual property rights. Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 18(2), 261–295.

Oguamanam, C. (2015). Pressuring ‘suspect orthodoxy’: Traditional knowledge and the patent system. In M. Rimmer (Ed.), Indigenous intellectual property: A handbook of contemporary research (pp. 313–333). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781955901.00024

Oguamanam, C. (2016). Tiered or differentiated approach to traditional knowledge: Insights for understanding the operations of the concept and evidentiary thresholds. Presentation to WIPO-IGC Seminar on Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property (Nov. 24–25, 2016). Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_iptk_ge_2_16/wipo_iptk_ge_2_16_presentation_7oguamanam.pdf

Oguamanam, C. (2017). Ramifications of WIPO IGC for IP and development. In D. F. Robinson, A. Abdel-Latif, & P. Roffe (Eds.), Protecting traditional knowledge: The WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge, and Folklore (pp. 339–346). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315666358-23

Oguamanam, C. (2018a). Wandering footloose: Traditional knowledge and the public domain revisited. Journal of World Intellectual Property, 21(5-6), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12096

Oguamanam, C. (2018b). Tiered or differentiated approach to traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions: The evolution of a concept. CIGI Papers No. 185. Waterloo, ON: Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3265807

Okediji, R. L.(2017). Negotiating the public domain in an international framework for genetic resources, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions. In D. F. Robinson, A. Abdel-Latif, & P. Roffe (Eds.), Protecting traditional knowledge: The WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge, and Folklore (pp. 141-172), New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315666358-8

Okediji, R. L. (2018). Traditional knowledge and the public domain. CIGI Papers No. 176. Waterloo, ON: Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI). Retrieved from https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/documents/Paper%20no.176.pdf

OseiTutu, J. J. (2011). A sui generis regime for traditional knowledge: The cultural divide in intellectual property law. Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 15(1), 147–215.

Posey, D. A., & Dutfield, G. (1996). Beyond intellectual property: Toward traditional resource rights for Indigenous Peoples and local communities. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre (IDRC). Retrieved from https://www.idrc.ca/en/book/beyond-intellectual-property-toward-traditional-resource-rights-indigenous-peoples-and-local

Raustiala, K. (2007). Density and conflict in international intellectual property law. UC Davis Law Review, 40(3), 1021–1038.

Reichman, J. H. (2009). Intellectual property in the twenty-first century: Will the developing countries lead or follow? Houston Law Review, 46(4), 1115–1185.

Robinson, D. F. (2010). Confronting biopiracy: Challenges, cases, and international debates. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849774710

Robinson, D. F., Abdel-Latif, A.,& Roffe, P. (Eds.) (2017). Protecting traditional knowledge:The WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge, and Folklore. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315666358

Scassa, T. (2015, November 26). Copyright of Inuit robe highlights gaps in Canadian legal framework [Blog post]. Teresa Scassa Blog. Retrieved from http://www.teresascassa.ca/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=200%3

Schneider, J. (1987). The anthropology of cloth. Annual Review of Anthropology, 16, 409–448. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.16.100187.002205

Stiglitz, J. E. (1999). Knowledge as a global public good. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195130529.003.0015

Stopp, M. P. (2012). The Coast Salish knitters and the Cowichan sweater: An event of national historic significance. Material Culture Review/ Revue de la culture matérielle, 76, 9–29. Retrieved from https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/MCR/article/view/21406/24805

Wiessner, S. (1999). Rights and status of Indigenous Peoples: A global comparative and international legal analysis. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 12.

Wiessner, S., & Graham, L. (2011). Indigenous sovereignty, culture, and international human rights law. South Atlantic Quarterly, 110(2), 403–427. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-1162516

Yu, P. K. (2007). International enclosure, the regime complex, and intellectual property schizophrenia. Michigan State Law Review, 2007(1), 1–33.

Downloads

Published

27-06-2019

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Oguamanam, C. (2019) “Towards a Tiered or Differentiated Approach to Protection of Traditional Knowledge (TK) and Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs) in Relation to the Intellectual Property System”, The African Journal of Information and Communication (AJIC) [Preprint], (23). doi:10.23962/10539/27533.
Views
  • Abstract 273
  • pdf 170