MOOCs as "Semicommons" in the Knowledge Commons Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23962/10539/21584Keywords:
knowledge commons, semicommons, massive open online course (MOOC), copyright, access to knowledge (A2K), developmentAbstract
The commons approach to knowledge governance is an increasingly popular and successful model for mediating and explaining the ways in which knowledge producers and users, institutions, and shared information resources, interact in social and cultural domains. There is a growing body of literature on the knowledge commons, to which this article seeks to contribute by offering an analysis of massive open online courses (MOOCs). The study outlined in this article deployed the knowledge commons research framework developed by Madison, Frischmann and Strandburg (2010). This framework attempts to align studies of knowledge commons by providing a structured yet flexible set of research questions that emphasise the dynamic relation between default governance regimes (such as proprietary intellectual property rights), tools and infrastructure, and social and cultural norms. The study determined that the MOOC environment exhibits some characteristics of a knowledge commons, and thus the Madison et al. (2010) framework can be productively applied in this context. In addition, the study found that, due to the generally conventional copyright paradigms and varying degrees of openness within the proprietary MOOC platforms, MOOCs can be considered a type of what Madison et al. (2010) term a "semicommons". Furthermore, because access to learning resources, a key element of access to knowledge (A2K), is an important driver of development, and because openness is an important facilitator of that access, the semicommons status of MOOCs (as learning resources) to some extent mitigates their contribution to increased A2K.
References
Anderson, T. (2013). Promise and/or peril: MOOCs and open and distance education. Athabasca University. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.363.4943&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Armstrong, C., De Beer, J., Kawooya, D., Prabhala, A., & Schonwetter, T. (2010). Chapter 1: Introduction. In C. Armstrong, J. De Beer, D. Kawooya, A. Prabhala, & T. Schonwetter (Eds.), Access to knowledge in Africa: The role of copyright (pp. 1-21). Cape Town: UCT Press. Retrieved from http://www.idrc.ca/en/book/access-knowledge-africa-role-copyright
Benkler, Y. (2008). The university in the networked economy and society: Challenges and possibilities. In R. N. Katz (Ed.), The tower and the cloud: Higher education in the age of cloud computing (pp. 51-61). Educause. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/research-and-publications/books/tower-and-cloud
Boga, S., & McGreal, R. (2014). Introducing MOOCs to Africa: New economy skills for Africa program - ICT. Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from http://www.col.org/resources/introducing-moocs-africa-new-economy-skills-africa-program-ict
Cape Town Open Education Declaration (2007). Retrieved from http://www.capetowndeclaration.org/
Czerniewicz, L., Deacon, A., Small, J., & Walji, S. (2014). Developing world MOOCs: A curriculum view of the MOOC landscape.Journal of Global Literacies,Technologies, and Emerging Pedagogies, 2(3), 122-139. Retrieved from http://joglep.com/files/7614/0622/4917/2._Developing_world_MOOCs.pdf
Czerniewicz, L., Deacon, A., Fife, M., Small, J., & Walji, S. (2015). Position paper: MOOCs. Centre for Innovation in Learning & Teaching (CILT), University of Cape Town. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/14041
Drache, D., & Froese, M. (2005). The global cultural commons after Cancun: Identity, diversity and citizenship. CLPE Research Paper No. 2. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.829987
Educause. (2013). Legal issues in MOOCs. Educause Brief. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/LIVE1319S.pdf
Frischmann, B. (2008). Speech, spillovers, and the First Amendment. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2008(1), 301-333. Retrieved from http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1428&context=uclf
Frischmann, B., Madison, M., & Strandburg, K. (2014). Governing knowledge commons. In B. Frischmann, M. Madison, & K. Strandburg (Eds.), Governing knowledge commons (pp. 1-43). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199972036.001.0001
Fuster Morell, M. (2014). Governance of online creation communities for the building of digital commons: Viewed through the framework of institutional analysis and development. In B. Frischmann, M. Madison, & K. Strandburg (Eds.), Governing knowledge commons (pp. 281-312). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199972036.003.0009
Garrido, M., Koepke, L., Andersen, S., Mena, A., Macapagal, M., & Dalvit, L. (2016). An examination of MOOC usage for professional workforce development outcomes in Colombia, the Philippines, and South Africa. Technology and Social Change Group (TASCHA), Information School, University of Washington, Seattle. Retrieved from https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/bitstream/handle/1773/35647/Advancing_MOOCs_for_Development_Final_Report_2016.pdf?sequence=9
Hadi, S., & Gagen, P. (2016). New model for measuring MOOCs completion rates. Paper presented to 2016 European MOOCs Stakeholder Summit (EMOOCS 2016), 22-24 February, University of Graz, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/20434486/New_model_for_measuring_MOOCs_completion_rates
Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2007). Introduction: An overview of the knowledge commons. In C. Hess & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice (pp. 3-26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6980.003.0003
Hill, P. (2015, 25 March). How much do college students actually pay for textbooks? Retrieved from http://mfeldstein.com/how-much-do-college-students-actually-pay-for-textbooks
Internet.org. (2014). State of connectivity 2014: A report on global Internet access. Retrieved from https://fbnewsroomus.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/state-of-connectivity_3.pdf
Jones, M. L., & Regner, L. (2016). Users or students? Privacy in university MOOCS. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(5), 1473-1496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9692-7
Katz, R. (2012). The gathering cloud: Is this the end of the middle? In R. Katz (Ed.), The tower and the cloud: Higher education in the age of cloud computing (pp. 2-42). Educause. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/research-and-publications/books/tower-and-cloud
Kop, R., & Fournier, H. (2015). Peer2Peer and open pedagogy of MOOCs to support the knowledge commons. In C. Bonk, M. Lee, T. Reeves, & T. Reynolds (Eds.), MOOCs and open education around the world (pp. 303-314). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315751108-35
Liyanagunawardena, T., Williams, S., & Adams, A. (2013). The impact and reach of MOOCs: A developing countries' perspective. eLearning Papers, 33, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v1i2.96
Madison, M., Frischmann, B., & Strandburg, K. (2009). The university as constructed cultural commons. Journal of Law and Policy, 30, 365-403. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1256090
Madison, M., Frischmann, B., & Strandburg, K. (2010). Constructing commons in the cultural environment. Cornell Law Review, 95, 657-710. Retrieved from http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/madison-frischmann-strandburg-final.pdf
Okediji, R. (2006). The international copyright system: limitations, exceptions and public interest considerations for developing countries. UNCTAD-ICTSD Issue Paper No. 15. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development and International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.7215/IP_IP_20060601
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pappano, L. (2012, 2 November). The year of the MOOC. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1
Porter, J. (2013). MOOCs,"courses," and the question of faculty and student copyrights. In The CCCC-IP Annual: Top intellectual property developments of 2012. Intellectual Property Caucus of the Conference on College Composition and Communication (CCCC-IP). Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Groups/CCCC/Committees/TopIP2012Collection.pdf
Reich, J. (2012, 7 May). Summarizing all MOOCs in one slide: Market, open and Dewey. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/edtechresearcher/2012/05/all_moocs_explained_market_open_and_dewey.html
Republic of South Africa (RSA). (1978). Copyright Act 98 of 1978, as last amended in 2002. Retrieved from http://www.cipro.co.za/legislation%20forms/Copyright/Copyright%20Act.pdf
Schonwetter, T., Ncube, C., & Chetty, P., (2010). Chapter 8: South Africa. In C. Armstrong, J. De Beer, D. Kawooya, A. Prabhala, & T. Schonwetter (Eds.), Access to knowledge in Africa: The role of copyright (pp. 231-280). Cape Town: UCT Press. Retrieved from http://www.idrc.ca/en/book/access-knowledge-africa-role-copyright
Shah, D. (2014). How does Coursera make money? Retrieved from http://www.edsurge.com/ news/2014-10-15-how-does-coursera-make-money
Shah, D. (2015). By the numbers: MOOCs in 2015. Retrieved from http://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-2015-stats
United Nations (UN). (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr
University of Cape Town (UCT). (n.d.). University of Cape Town intellectual property policy. Retrieved from http://www.uct.ac.za/downloads/uct.ac.za/about/policies/intellect_property.pdf
University of Cape Town (UCT). (2013). Reprographic reproduction under University of Cape Town's blanket copyright licence; General guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.health.uct.ac.za/usr/health/calendar/notices/UCT_copyright_notice_2013.pdf
Weller, M. (2014). The battle for open: How openness won and why it doesn't feel like victory. London: Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bam
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
- Abstract 178
- pdf 111