Utility Model Protection in Kenya: The Case for Substantive Examination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23962/10539/21588Keywords:
intellectual property, utility model certificates (UMCs), patents, examination, registration, developing countries, patent offices, Africa, KenyaAbstract
The patent-granting authority of the Kenyan government ceased examining applications for utility model certificates (UMCs) in 2014, after 20 years of examination. This event resulted in an immediate and dramatic increase in the number of granted UMCs. The authors reviewed a selection of UMCs, some of which were granted after substantive examination and some of which were granted without substantive examination. Errors were found in both groups, and the overall quality of granted UMCs declined after cessation of substantive examination. The authors conclude that a return to substantive examination of UMC applications would, on balance, be beneficial to Kenya’s innovative ecosystem, and recommend that such examination be reinstated.
References
Adams & Adams. (2012). Adams C Adams practical guide to intellectual property in Africa. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press (PULP. Retrieved from http://www.pulp.up.ac.za/pdf/2012_03/2012_03.pdf
Alfred, R. (2012, 19 March). 1474: Venice enacts a patently original idea. Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/2012/03/march-19-1474-venice-enacts-a-patently-original-idea
Boztosun, N. A. (2010). Exploring the utility of utility models for fostering innovation. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 15(6), 429-439.
Brack, H. P. (2009). Utility models and their comparison with patents and implications for the US intellectual property law system. Boston College Intellectual Property and Technology Forum, 1-15. Retrieved from http://bciptf.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/13-iptf-Brack.pdf
Condon, B. J., & Sinha, T. (2008). Global lessons from the AIDS pandemic: Economic, financial, legal and political implications. London: Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78392-3
Correa, C. M. (2011). Pharmaceutical innovation, incremental patenting and compulsory licensing. Geneva: South Centre.
Kameri-Mbote, P. (2005). Intellectual property protection in Africa: An assessment of the status of laws, research and policy analysis on intellectual property rights in Kenya. Geneva: International Environmental Law Research Centre.
Kaplan, D., Wynberg, R., Silveston, J., Lombard, C., Bramley, C., Bienabe, E., Kirsten, J., Barnard, H., Bromfield, T., & Sibanda, M. (2009). The economics of intellectual property in South Africa. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).
Kardam, D. K. (2007). Utility model – a tool for economic and technological development: A case study of Japan. Retrieved from http://www.jpo.go.jp/torikumi_e/kokusai_e/pdf/ipcoop_asia- pacific_e/india.pdf
Kenya Industrial Property Institute (KIPI). (2014). Industrial Property Journal 2014(4), 30 April. Retrieved from http://www.kipi.go.ke/index.php/past-ip-journals
KIPI. (n.d.). Standard notice to UMC applicants. Retrieved by authors from KIPI UMC dataLeith, D. P. (2000). Software utility models and SMEs. Journal of Information Law and Technology, 2000(2), 1-12.
Maina, C. K. (2007). What patents tell: Limitations of patent-based indicators of innovation. Journal of Law, Ethics and Intellectual Property, 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.scientificjournals.org/journals2007/articles/1254.pdf
Mwiya, B. M. (2012). Trends of patent and utility model activities in Asia and Africa: A comparison of regional innovation, FDI and economic activity. The WIPO Journal, 3(2), 256-278.
Odek, J. O. (1994). The Kenya patent law: Promoting local inventiveness or protecting foreign patentees? Journal of African Law, 38(2), 79-103. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855300005465
Pouris, A., & Pouris, A. (2011). Patents and economic development in South Africa: Managing intellectual property rights. South African Journal of Science, 107(11/12). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v107i11/12.355
Republic of Kenya. (2001). Industrial Property Act (IPA), 2001.
Republic of Kenya. (2002). Industrial Property Regulations, 2002.
Richards, J. (2010). Utility model protection throughout the world. Ladas & Parry LLP. Retrieved from http://www.ipo.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/03/Utility_Model_protection.pdf
Sanitam Services (E A) Ltd v Rentokil (K) Ltd C another (K) Ltd [2000] eKLR (High Court, 58 of 1999).
Standard Chartered Bank Ltd. v Lucton (Kenya) Ltd. Nairobi (Milimani) HCCC No. 462 of 1997.
Suthersanen, U. (2006). Utility models and inventions in developing countries. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). https://doi.org/10.7215/IP_IP_20060201
The Law Dictionary. (n.d.). What is SHALL? Retrieved from http://thelawdictionary.org/shall
Wen, Y.-F., & Matsaneng, T. (2014). Patents, pharmaceuticals and competition: Benefitting from an effective patent examination system. Retrieved from http://www.compcom.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Patents-Pharmaceuticals-and-Competition
World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO). (2006). Inventing the future: An introduction to patents for small and medium-sized enterprises. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/sme/917/wipo_pub_917.pdf
WIPO. (n.d.). Patents. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/patents/450/wipo_pub_l450pa.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
- Abstract 211
- pdf 156
.png){kind=spacer}