An assessment of website quality at Nigerian polytechnics and colleges of education




This study assessed the quality of the websites of Nigerian polytechnics and colleges of education. Using two web diagnostic tools, SEOptimer and W3C Markup Validation Service, a total of 213 sites were evaluated in terms of six performance indicators: search engine optimisation (SEO), usability, operational performance, social media integration, security, and HTML validation. The weakest performance across the sites of both polytechnics and colleges of education was found to be with respect to social media integration, with the vast majority of sites in both categories making no use of social media. The other two indicators against which sites in both categories of institutions tended to perform poorly were SEO and operational performance. The two areas where the sites in both institutional categories generally scored well were usability and HTML validation. Meanwhile, for the security indicator, the performance was highly variable among both polytechnic and college of education sites, with significant numbers of both strong and weak scores for sites. It was also found that polytechnic sites outperformed college of education sites on SEO to a statistically significant degree (bearing in mind that both categories of sites were weak in this area). It was also found that, among the polytechnic sites, the sites of the state government-owned institutions outperformed, to a statistically significant degree, the sites of the privately owned institutions in their operational performance measure.


Metrics Loading ...


Abdel-Basset, M., Zhou, Y., Mohamed, M., & Chang, V. (2018). A group decision making framework based on neutrosophic VIKOR approach for e-government website evaluation. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 34(6), 4213–4224.

Adaugo, C. Q., Ovute A. O., & Obochi, C. I. (2015). The influence of the social media on the Nigerian youths: Aba residents experience. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 3(3), 12–20.

Akgül, Y. (2016). Quality evaluation of e-government websites of Turkey. In Proceedings of 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI).

Akgül, Y. (2021). Accessibility, usability, quality performance, and readability evaluation of university websites of Turkey: A comparative study of state and private universities. Universal Access in the Information Society, 20(1), 157–170.

Almahamid, S. M., Tweiqat, A. F., & Almanaseer, M. S. (2016). University website quality characteristics and success: Lecturers’ perspective. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 22(1), 41–61.

Andalib, Z. & Danaee, H. (2013). A study on measuring the quality of university website. Management Science Letters, 3(7), 1955–1960.

Bukhari, S. A. H. (2011). What is comparative study? SSRN.

Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2009). The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis and generation of evidence (6th ed.). Saunders Elsevier.

Cartay, L. (2017, January 24). How to integrate social media into your website to increase your ecommerce sales. Digital Doughnut.

Chou, W., & Cheng, Y. (2012). A hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating website quality of professional accounting firms. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2783–2793.

Choudrie, J., Ghinea, G., & Weerakkody, V. (2004). Evaluating global e-government sites: A view using web diagnostic tools. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 2(2), 105–114.

Dani, D., & Agrawal, G. (2021). Evaluating the quality of Indian school education boards’ websites using multi criteria decision making models. International Journal of Information Technology, 13, 1–9.

Dominic, P. D. D., Jati, H., & Hanim, S. (2013). University website quality comparison by using non-parametric statistical test: A case study from Malaysia. International Journal of Operational Research, 16(3), 349–374.

Dominic, P. D. D., Jati, H., Sellapan, P., & Nee, G. K. (2011). A comparison of Asian e-government websites quality: Using a non-parametric test. International Journal Business Information Systems, 7(2), 220–246.

Dominic, P. D. D., & Khan, H. (2013). Measuring quality of Asian airline websites using analytical hierarchy process: A future customer satisfaction approach. In Proceedings of 2013 Information Systems International Conference (ISICO).

Elling, S., Lentz, L., De Jong, M., & Van den Bergh, H. (2012). Measuring the quality of governmental websites in a controlled versus an online setting with the “website evaluation questionnaire”. Government Information Quarterly, 29(3), 383–393.

Faustina, F., & Balaji, T. (2016). Evaluation of universities websites in Chennai city, India using analytical hierarchy process. In Proceedings of 2016 IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT).

Geron, G. (2018, February 26). Best practices in institutional websites for international visibility. Educause.

Glen, S. (2018, May 10). Total population sampling. Statistics How To.

Gong, J. W., Liu, H. C., You, X. Y., & Yin, L. (2021). An integrated multi-criteria decision making approach with linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets for e-learning website evaluation and selection. Applied Soft Computing, 102, 107118.

Greenfield, M. (2015). Why the web matters to higher education. Site Improve.

Hanover Research. (2014, July 22). Why marketing strategy matters in higher education.

Heng, C. (n.d.). What is HTML and CSS validation? Should you validate your web page? thesitewizard.

Jati, H., & Dominic, D. D. (2009). Quality evaluation of e-government website using web diagnostic tools: Asian case. IEEE Computer Society, 1, 85–89.

Jundillah, M. L., Suseno, J. E., & Surarso, B. (2019). Evaluation of e-learning websites using the Webqual method and importance performance analysis. E3S Web of Conferences, 125, 24001, 1–5.

Kaur, S., Kaur, K., & Kaur, P. (2016). An empirical performance evaluation of universities website. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975–8887), 146(15), 10–16.

Khraim, H. S. (2015). The impact of search engine optimization dimensions on companies using online advertisement in Jordan. American Journal of Business and Management, 4(2), 76–84.

Kincl, T., & Strach, P. (2012). Measuring website quality: Asymmetric effect of user satisfaction. Behaviour and Information Technology, 31(7), 647–657.

Kravchenko, Y., Leshchenko, O., Dakhno, N., & Radko, M. (2021). Comparative evaluation of universities websites quality. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3132, 166–175.

Lawal, I. (2019, March 28). Making colleges of education relevant in 21st century. The Guardian.

Lemos, Y. J., & Joshi, A. R. (2017). Search engine optimization to enhance user interaction. In Proceedings of 2017 International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud).

Maksimava, M. (2022, July 19). Site quality: Google’s major ranking signal explained. SEO PowerSuite Blog.

Marszałkowski, J., Marszałkowski, J. M., & Drozdowski, M. (2014). Empirical study of load time factor in search engine ranking. Journal of Web Engineering, 13(1), 114–128.

Massey, A. P., Khatri, V., & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (2007). Usability of online services: The role of technology readiness and context. Decision Sciences Institute, 38(2), 277–308. DOI:

Mbanaso, U., Chukwudebe, G., & Atimati, E. (2015). Nigeria’s evolving presence in cyberspace. The African Journal of Information and Communication (AJIC), 15, 106–113.

MintTwist (2016, May 20). The importance of SEO for universities.

Nadeema, W., Andreini, D., Salo, J., & Laukkanen, T. (2015). Engaging customers online through websites and social media: A gender study of Italian Generation Y clothing consumers. International Journal of Information Management, 35(4), 432–442.

National Board for Technical Education (NBTE). (n.d.).

National Commission for Colleges of Education (NCCE) (n.d.).

Napier, S. (n.d.). What makes a website a high quality website? SEO Expert.

Nwagwu, W. E., & Agarin, O. (2008). Nigerian university websites: A webometric analysis. Webology, 5(4)

Ogungbe, V. (n.d.). The importance of polytechnic education in Nigeria. InfoGuide Nigeria.

Olaleye, S. A., Sanusi, I. T., Ukpabi, D. C., & Okunoye, A. (2018). Evaluation of Nigeria universities websites quality: A comparative analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1717.

Park, H., & Kim, Y. (2014) The role of social network websites in the consumer–brand relationship. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(4), 460–467.

Pechnikov, A. A., & Nwohiri, A. M. (2012) Webometric analysis of Nigerian university websites. Webology 9(1).

Perçin, S. (2019). A combined fuzzy multicriteria decision-making approach for evaluating hospital website quality. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 26(3–4), 129–144.

Rocha, A. (2012). Framework for a global quality evaluation of a website. Online Information Review, 36(3), 374–382.

Shi, Y. (2006). Quality services need quality websites: An evaluation of three official world expo home pages using web diagnostic tools. In Proceedings of 2006 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics.

Slawski, B. (2011, April 19). Just what is website quality? SEO by the sea.

Søruma, H., Andersen, K. N., & Vatrapu, R. (2012). Public websites and human–computer interaction: An empirical study of measurement of website quality and user satisfaction. Behaviour and Information Technology, 31(7), 697–706.

Suwawi, J. D. D., Darwiyanto, E., & Rochmani, M. (2015). Evaluation of academic website using ISO/1EC 9126. In Proceedings of 2015 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT).

Tate, E. (2017, April 5). Prospective students seek information, but colleges don’t always provide. Inside Higher Ed.

Torkildson, A. (2018, November 8). 13 new ways to incorporate social media in your website. Social Media Explorer.

Ubabukoh, O. (2016, June 7). Nigeria ranks 16th in cyberattacks vulnerability index. Punch.




How to Cite

Ibhadode, O. and Opesade, A. (2022) “An assessment of website quality at Nigerian polytechnics and colleges of education”, The African Journal of Information and Communication (AJIC). South Africa, (30). doi: 10.23962/ajic.i30.13987.



Research Articles