Brazil’s over-centralised governance of digital transformation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23962/ajic.i30.14843Abstract
This article analyses governance of Brazil’s Digital Transformation Strategy (E-Digital) through a new public governance (NPG) lens. Based on the analysis, the author finds that governance of E-Digital is too centralised, with too much decision-making power resting with state actors at the federal level, led by the Presidency. This analysis of the Brazilian experience aims to contribute towards understanding the modalities necessary for democratic, sustainable governance of digital transformation in Global Southern contexts.
References
Centre for Management and Strategic Studies (CGEE). (2021). Diagnóstico da E-Digital: Atualização da Estratégia Brasileira para a Transformação Digital [E-Digital diagnostics. Update of the Brazilian Strategy for Digital Transformation]. https://www.cgee.org.br/documents/10195/734063/Diagnostico+E-digital.pdf/8c028cc0-4dae-4ff2-abf7-220acf40779a?version=1.2
Centro Regional de Estudos para o Desenvolvimento da Sociedade da Informação (CETIC). (2021). Executive summary – Survey on the use of information and communication technologies in Brazilian households –ICT households 2020. https://www.cetic.br/pt/publicacao/executive-summary-survey-on-the-use-of-information-and-communication-technologies-in-brazilian-households-ict-households-2020/
Chantillon, M. (2021). A governance framework facilitating a digital transformation of the public administration. PhD thesis. Instituut voor de Overheid, KU Leuven. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/637247
Dener, C., Nii-Amponsah, H., Ghunney, L. E., & Johns, K. D. (2021). GovTech maturity index: The state of public sector digital transformation. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1765-6
Hoque, M. J., & Zakaria, A. F. M. (2014). Challenges of public management in the Global South. Southern Conjuncture, 5(21–22), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.22456/2178-8839.45448
Jessop, B. (1993). Towards a Schumpeterian workfare state? Preliminary remarks on post-Fordist political economy. Studies in Political Economy, 40, 7–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.1993.11675409
Klievink, B., & Janssen, M. (2009). Realizing joined-up government — Dynamic capabilities and stage models for transformation. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.007
Liva, G., Codagnone, C., Misuraca, G., Gineikyte, V., & Barcevičius, E. (2020). Exploring digital government transformation: A literature review. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2020) (pp. 502–509). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428578
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Nielsen, M., & Jordanoski, Z. (2020). Digital transformation, governance and coordination models: A comparative study of Australia, Denmark and the Republic of Korea. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o ’20) (pp. 285–293). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3396956.3396987
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). Digital government review of Brazil: Towards the digital transformation of the public sector. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307636-en
OECD. (2020a). Going digital in Brazil. https://doi.org/10.1787/e9bf7f8a-en
OECD. (2020b). Policy framework on sound public governance: Baseline features of governments that work well. https://doi.org/10.1787/c03e01b3-en
Osborne, S. P. (2010). Introduction: The (new) public governance: A suitable case for treatment? In S. P. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861684
Pereira, B. A. D., & Ckagnazaroff, I. B. (2021). Contributions to consolidate the new public governance. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120200104x
Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021). Digital government transformation: A structural equation modeling analysis of driving and impeding factors. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356
Wirtz, B., Langer, P., & Schmidt, F. (2021). Digital government: Business model development for public value creation – A dynamic capabilities based framework. Public Administration Quarterly, 45(3), 232–255. https://doi.org/10.37808/paq.45.3.2
Witesman, E. M. (2020). Centralization and decentralization: Compatible governance concepts and practices. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1390
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Larissa Galdino de Magalhães Santos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.png){kind=spacer}