Intersections between civic technology (civic tech) and governance in Nigeria and South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23962/ajic.i33.18883Keywords:
civic technology (civic tech), governance, digitisation, social accountability, open data, Nigeria, South AfricaAbstract
This study explores the drivers and impact of the civic technology (“civic tech”) ecosystems in Nigeria and South Africa, with a focus on civic tech actors’ engagement with governance matters in the two countries. Framed by a social accountability conceptual framework and based on data collected from an African civic tech database and interviews with civic tech players in both countries, the research explored the work of 26 initiatives in each country. Based on the content in the civic tech database, it was found that, in both countries, civic tech initiatives’ foci could be grouped into five categories: (1) citizen engagement and participation; (2) accountability and transparency; (3) service delivery and government responsiveness; (4) improving and/or helping government; and (5) policy. The emphases among these foci were found to be largely similar between the two countries, with the exception of the fourth category of focus—improving and/ or helping government—which was significantly more prominent in the work of the South African initiatives than in the work of their Nigerian counterparts. A similar difference was identified in the findings from the interviews with Nigerian and South African civic tech actors. The South African interviewees identified, to a greater extent than the Nigerian interviewees, a collaborative ethos that was bringing government entities and civic tech actors together to jointly implement projects, including projects that had been fully integrated into the operations of government departments.
References
African Union (AU). (2024, April 12). The African Union launches the second edition of the AU Civic Tech Fund [Press release]. https://au.int/en/pressreleases/20240412/african-union-launches-second-edition-au-civic-tech-fund
Almén, O., & Burell, M. (2018). Social accountability as social movement outcome: Protests in a Chinese city. Social Movement Studies, 17(6), 716–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1521716
Aragón, P., Garcia, A., Le Dantec, C. A., Flores-Saviaga, C., & Saldivar, J. (2020). Civic technologies: Research, practice and open challenges. In CSCW ’20 companion: Companion publication of the 2020 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 537–545). https://doi.org/10.1145/3406865.3430888
Asongu, S. A., & Nwachukwu, J. C. (2016). The role of governance in mobile phones for inclusive human development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Technovation, 55–56, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.04.002
Bjerde, A.,& Demirgüç-Kunt, A.(2021, March 30). Digitalization and data can vastly improve public service delivery for citizens. World Bank Blogs. https://blogs.worldbank.org/europeandcentralasia/digitalization-and-data-can-vastly-improve-public-service-delivery-citizens?deliveryName=FCP_19_DM99928
Bosch, T., & Roberts, T. (2021). South Africa digital rights landscape report. In T. Roberts (Ed.), Digital rights in closing civic space: Lessons from ten African countries. Institute of Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.19088/ids.2021.010
Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Wetterberg, A. (2015). Gauging the effects of social accountability on services, governance, and citizen empowerment. Public Administration Review, 76(2), 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12399
Brummel, L. (2021). Social accountability between consensus and confrontation: Developing a theoretical framework for societal accountability relationships of public sector organizations. Administration & Society, 53(7), 1046–1077. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720988529
BudgIT Foundation. (2020). Annual report 2020: Impact in unprecedented times. https://budgit.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/2020_Annual_Report.pdf
Chatwin, M., & Mayne, J. (2020). Improving monitoring and evaluation in the civic tech ecosystem. JeDEM – eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 12(2), 216–241. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v12i2.598
Civic Tech Innovation Network (CTIN). (n.d.). African Civic Tech Atlas. https://civictech.africa/databases
CTIN. (2024, May 2). African Union Civic Tech Fund (AUCTF) 2.0. https://civictech.africa/auctf-2-2
Couve, P., Gbetoglo, E., Grange, J., Kalonji, C., Mukuku, F., Sbouai, S., Gandigbe, L., Osé Coliko, A., Orembo, E., Gichanga, M., & Kasongo, A. (2018). Civic tech in Africa: People and technology dynamising our democracies. CFi Media Development. https://cfi.fr/en/news/civic-tech-africa-people-and-technology-dynamising-our-democracies
de Rochegonde, A. (2020, November 4). Des civic tech en Afrique contre la colère et l’impuissance. Stratégies. https://www.strategies.fr/actualites/medias/4052143W/des-civic-tech-en-afrique-contre-la-colere-et-l-impuissance.html
Duberry, J. (2022). AI and civic tech: Engaging citizens in decision-making processes but not without risks. In Artificial intelligence and democracy: Risks and promises of AI-mediated citizen–government relations (pp. 195–216). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977319 Gilman, H. R. (2017). Civic tech for urban collaborative governance. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(3), 744–750. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096517000531
Grandvoinnet, H., Aslam, G., & Raha, S. (2015). Opening the black box: The contextual drivers of social accountability. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0481-6
Gritsenko, D., & Indukaev, A. (2021). Digitalising city governance in Russia: The case of the “Active Citizen” platform. Europe–Asia Studies, 73(6), 1102–1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2021.1946013
Kaur, N., & Sitlhou, L. (2017). Governance of development assistance: Issues and challenges. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 63(2), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019556117699731
Keping, Y. (2017). Governance and good governance: A new framework for political analysis. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-017-0197-4
Khene, C., Siebörger, I., Thinyane, M., & Simuja, C. (2021). Power participation in digital citizen engagement in South African local government: The case of MOBISAM. ArXiv.org. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.09798
Knutas, A., Siemon, D., Tylosky, N., & Maccani, G. (2023). Contradicting motivations in civic tech software development: Analysis of a grassroots project. ArXiv.org. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2302.03469
Makara, S. (2018). Decentralisation and good governance in Africa: A critical review. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 12(2), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPSIR2016.0973
Mbugua, M. (2018). Mind the gap: Bridging the divide between tech hubs and civic tech. Making All Voices Count. https://www.makingallvoicescount.org/blog/mind-gap-bridging-divide-tech-hubs-civic-tech
McGee, R., Edwards, D., Anderson, C., Hudson, H., & Feruglio, F. (2018). Appropriating technology for accountability: Messages from Making All Voices Count. Making All Voices Count. https://www.makingallvoicescount.org/publication/appropriating-technology-accountability-messages-making-voices-count-2
McNutt, J. G., Justice, J. B., Melitski, J. M., Ahn, M. J., Siddiqui, S. R., Carter, D. T., & Kline, A. D. (2016). The diffusion of civic technology and open government in the United States. Information Polity, 21(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-160385
Network Impact. (2015). Assessing civic tech: Case studies and resources for tracking outcomes. Knight Foundation. https://knightfoundation.org/reports/assessing-civic-tech-case-studies-and-resources-tr
Nyaranga, M. S., Hao, C., & Hongo, D. O. (2019). Strategies of integrating public participation in governance for sustainable development in Kenya. Public Policy and Administration Research, 9(7), 56–63. https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/PPAR/article/view/48764
OpenUp. (2022). Annual report: March 2021-February 2022. https://openup.org.za/annual-report/openup-annual-report-2021-2022
Pade-Khene, C., Thinyane, H., & Machiri, M. (2017, June 13). Building foundations before technology: An operation model for digital citizen engagement in resource constrained contexts. In 17th European Conference on Digital Government (ECDG 2017). http://collections.unu.edu/view/UNU:6206
Poblet, M., & Plaza, E. (2017). Democracy models and civic technologies: Tensions, trilemmas, and trade-offs. ArXiv.org. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.09015
Roberts, T. (Ed.). (2021). Digital rights in closing civic space: Lessons from ten African countries. Institute of Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.19088/IDS.2021.003
Rotich, J. (2017). Ushahidi: Empowering citizens through crowdsourcing and digital data collection. Field Actions Science Reports. The Journal of Field Actions, Special Issue 16, 36–38. https://journals.openedition.org/factsreports/4316
Rumbul, R. (2015). Who benefits from civic technology? mySociety. https://research.mysociety.org/html/who-benefits/#start
Rumbul, R., Moulder, G., & Parsons, A. (2018). Parliament and the people: How digital technologies are shaping democratic information flow in Sub-Saharan Africa. mySociety. https://research.mysociety.org/html/parliament-and-the-people/#top
Ruppen, D., & Brugger, F. (2022). “I will sample until things get better – or until I die.” Potential and limits of citizen science to promote social accountability for environmental pollution. World Development, 157, 105952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105952
Skaržauskienė, A., & Mačiulienė, M. (2020). Mapping international civic technologies platforms. Informatics, 7(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics7040046
Stempeck, M. (2023). Civic tech field guide. https://civictech.guide
Sun, Y., & Yan, W. (2020). The power of data from the Global South: Environmental civic tech and data activism in China. International Journal of Communication, 14(0), 2144–2162. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/13440
Waddington, H., Stevenson, J., Sonnenfeld, A., & Gaarder, M. (2018). Protocol: Participation, inclusion, transparency and accountability (PITA) to improve public services in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 14(1), 1–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.205
Wakabi, W., & Grönlund, Å. (2015). Citizen-to-citizen vs. citizen-to-government eparticipation in Uganda: Implications for research and practice. In 2015 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing (pp. 95–107). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22500-5_8
Yimer, M. (2015). The role of ICT for good governance and agricultural development in Ethiopia: Local evidence from Southern Ethiopia. International Journal of Political Science and Development, 3(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.14662/IJPSD2015.001
Yoshida, M., & Thammetar, T. (2021). Education between govtech and civic tech. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 16(4), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i04.18769
Zhang, W., Lim, G., Perrault, S. T., & Wang, C. (2022). A review of research on civic technology: Definitions, theories, history and insights. ArXiv.org. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2204.11461
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Melissa Zisengwe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
- Abstract 77
- PDF 31
.png){kind=spacer}