Factors influencing South African consumer acceptance of marketers’ use of human digital twins (HDTs)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23962/ajic.i36.24055Keywords:
human digital twin (HDT), artificial intelligence (AI), marketing, technology acceptance model (TAM), consumer choice modellingAbstract
Human digital twins (HDTs) are virtual, data-driven consumer replicas that are generated by AI and used by marketers to analyse and predict consumer behaviours. By collating large amounts of personalised data on the online behaviour of specific consumers, an HDT facilitates sophisticated modelling of those individuals’ preferences and potential future choices, thus assisting marketers in determining which consumer to target with product offerings. This study aimed to identify the factors that may influence South African consumers’ acceptance of HDT use for marketing purposes. A cohort of 121 adults was recruited to complete a Likert-scale survey comprising statements linked to five factors that could influence a consumer’s acceptance of HDT use. Two of the tested factors, namely perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, were drawn from the technology acceptance model (TAM), with three additional factors, namely knowledge, trust, and technological proficiency, added based on constructs present elsewhere in the technology-acceptance literature. Statistical analysis of the survey responses found that all five factors had statistically significant positive relationships with customer acceptance of HDT use.
References
Agrawal, A., Thiel, R., Jain, P., Singh, V., & Fischer, M. (2023). Digital Twin: Where do humans fit in? Automation in Construction, 148, 104749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104749
Barricelli, B. R., Casiraghi, E., Gliozzo, J., Petrini, A., & Valtolina, S. (2020). Human Digital Twin for fitness management. IEEE Access, 8, 26637–26664. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2971576
Braun, M. (2021). Represent me: please! Towards an ethics of digital twins in medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47(6), 394–400. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106134
Budiu, R. (2025, August 1). Digital twins: Simulating humans with generative AI. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/digital-twins
Bulsara, H. P., & Vaghela, P. S. (2020). Understanding the role of trust in online shopping intention for consumer electronics products. Scholedge International Journal of Management and Development, 7(3), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.37591/ecft.v7i1.2363
Cui, J. (2025). Human AI in digital media effects on digital twins and the moderating role of personalised advertising. Media, Communication, and Technology, 1(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.30560/mct.v1n1p35
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Favela, L. H., & Amon, M. J. (2023). The ethics of human digital twins: Counterfeit people, personhood, and the right to privacy. In IEEE 3rd International Conference on Digital Twins and Parallel Intelligence (DTPI) (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/DTPI59677.2023.10365409
Fuller, A., Fan, Z., Day, C., & Barlow, C. (2020). Digital Twin: Enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE Access, 8, 108952–108971. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998358
Gaffinet, B., Al Haj Ali, J., Naudet, Y., & Panetto, H. (2025). Human Digital Twins: A systematic literature review and concept disambiguation for industry 5.0. Computers in Industry, 166, 104230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2024.104230
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27, 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
Gran, A. B., Booth, P., & Bucher, T. (2021). To be or not to be algorithm aware: A question of a new digital divide? Information Communication and Society, 24(12), 1779–1796. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1736124
Grefen, P. (2021). Digital literacy and electronic business. Encyclopedia, 1(3), 934–941. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia1030071
Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2017). Digital Twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems (pp. 85–113). Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4
Groß, M., & Sohn, S. (2021). Understanding the consumer acceptance of mobile shopping: The role of consumer shopping orientations and mobile shopping touchpoints. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 31(1), 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2020.1852096
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
Hoff, K., & Bashir, M. (2015). Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 57, 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814547570
Hornik, J., & Rachamim, M. (2025). AI-enabled consumer digital twins as a platform for research aimed at enhancing customer experience. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-025-00527-3
Jan, M. T., de Jager, J. W., Ameziane, A. M., & Sultan, N. (2019). Applying technology acceptance model to investigate the use of smartphone advertising in Malaysia. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 11(1), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v11i1(J).2760
Jones, D., Snider, C., Nassehi, A., Yon, J., & Hicks, B. (2020). Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 29, 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002
Kabalska, A., & Wagner, R. (2025). The better ones: The rise of human digital twins—our future or our demise? Future Business Journal, 11(155). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00582-y
Kwok, K. (2025, February 20). AI agents have clear mission, hazy business model. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/breakingviews/ai-agents-have-clear-mission-hazy-business-model-2025-02-20
Löcklin, A., Jung, T., Jazdi, N., Ruppert, T., & Weyrich, M. (2021). Architecture of a Human-Digital Twin as common interface for Operator 4.0 applications. Procedia CIRP, 104, 458–463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.077
Malik, H.A.S., Abdullah, N.A.H.A., & Fakhrorazi, A. (2025). Understanding customer loyalty in mobile wallet apps: A post-pandemic analysis with customer involvement as moderator. Innovative Marketing, 21(1), 338–349. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.21(1).2025.27
Manchanda, S., Yadav, P., Doan, K., & Keerthi, S. S. (2019). Targeted display advertising: The case of preferential attachment. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 1868–1877). https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData47090.2019.9006184
Marques, E., de Oliveira Neto, J. D., & Marques, E. D. M. R. (2013). Digital proficiency and digital inclusion: Comparison between students of computer science, public relations and engineering. In IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, March (pp. 934–939). https://doi.org/10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530219
McKinsey. (2024, August 26). What is digital-twin technology? https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-digital-twin-technology
Saad, N., & Sankaran, S. (2020). Technology proficiency in teaching and facilitating. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education. https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-591.
Sagnier, C., Loup-Escande, E., Lourdeaux, D., Thouvenin, I., & Vallery, G. (2020). User acceptance of virtual reality: An extended Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(11), 993–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1708612
Shahat, E., Hyun, C. T., & Yeom, C. (2021). City digital twin potentials: A review and research agenda. Sustainability, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063386
Shin, J., & Yu, J. (2021). Targeted advertising and consumer inference. Marketing Science, 40(5), 900–922. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2021.1284
Sørensen, J. K., & van den Bulck, H. (2020). Public service media online, advertising and the third-party user data business: A trade versus trust dilemma? Convergence, 26(2), 421–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856518790203
Tao, F., & Zhang, M. (2017). Digital twin shop-floor: A new shop-floor paradigm towards smart manufacturing. IEEE Access, 5, 20418–20427. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2756069
Truby, J., & Brown, R. (2021). Human digital thought clones: The Holy Grail of artificial intelligence for big data. Information and Communications Technology Law, 30(2), 140–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2020.1850174
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Vijayakumar, S. (2020). Chapter Eleven – Digital twin in consumer choice modeling. Advances in Computers, 117(1), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adcom.2019.09.010
Wang, P. A. (2010). Information security knowledge and behavior: An adapted model of technology acceptance. In 2010 2nd International Conference on Education Technology and Computer, vol. 2 (pp. 364–367). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETC.2010.5529366
Zhao, J., Fang, S., & Jin, P. (2018). Modeling and quantifying user acceptance of personalized business modes based on TAM, trust and attitude. Sustainability, 10(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020356
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Morne Botha, Margaret Cullen, André Calitz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
- Abstract 39
- PDF 31
.png){kind=spacer}