Regulatory Effectiveness: Stakeholder Perceptions of Namibia’s Communications Regulatory Framework
Keywords:
communications regulatory framework, regulatory effectiveness, institutional endowment, regulatory governance, regulatory incentives, regulatory purpose, competitiveness, regulatory independence, perception studies, NamibiaAbstract
Communications regulatory frameworks are established to achieve myriad regulatory objectives. These may include affordable pricing, consumer welfare and competition. A regulatory framework is therefore endowed with regulatory governance measures and regulatory incentives to enable it to achieve these purposes. In applying these measures and incentives, the framework becomes effective, or ineffective, depending on whether the regulatory purpose is met. The purpose of this qualitative exploratory study was to assess the perceptions of the stakeholders, as active participants in the evolution of the framework, regarding the effectiveness of the types of measures and incentives implemented within the Namibian institutional context. Perception studies can be valuable because they offer insight on how the policies, laws and regulations that are implemented are viewed by the stakeholders for whom they are designed and implemented. While these are not the only inputs, knowledge of stakeholder views informs the future redesign of these measures and incentives to make the regulatory framework increasingly more effective. One of the main findings of the research was that the perceived conflict of interests between the ICT policy role of the Ministry of ICT and its shareholder role over Telecom Namibia negatively impacts competition. Its policy support for the dominant role of Telecom Namibia is in conflict with the regulatory purpose of encouraging private investment. The conclusion was that this regulatory governance design measure conflicts with the regulatory framework and requires legislative amendment and a re-design of the framework in an effort to improve competitiveness in Namibia's electronic communications market.
References
Blackman, C., & Srivastava, L. (2011). Telecommunications regulation handbook. 10th anniversary edition. Washington: The World Bank. Available at http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/reg/D-REG-TRH.01-2011-PDF-E.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/13277
Brown A., Stern J., Tenenbaum B., & Gencer D. (2006). Handbook for evaluating infrastructure regulatory systems. Washington: The World Bank. Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTENERGY/Resources/336805-1156971270190/HandbookForEvaluatingInfrastructureRegulation062706.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6579-3
Clarke, E., & Dawson, R. (2000). Evaluation research: An introduction to principles, methods and practice. London: Sage Publications. CRAN (2011a, May 18). Regulations setting out broadcasting and telecommunications service licence categories. Government Gazette No. 4714, Government Notice No. 124.
CRAN (2011b, July 15). Notice in terms of the regulations regarding licensing procedures for telecommunications and broadcasting service licences and spectrum use licences regulations regarding consumer complaints. Government Gazette No. 4756, Government Notice No. 217.
CRAN (2012a, March 20). Notice in terms of the regulations regarding licensing procedures for telecommunications and broadcasting service licenses and spectrum use licences. Government Gazette No. 4899, Government Notice No. 57.
CRAN (2012b, December 12). Notice of intention to make regulations in respect of regulations regarding licensee disputes. Government Gazette No. 5092, Government Notice 432.
CRAN (2012c, March 20). Notice in terms of section 78 of the Communications Act No.8 of 2009. Government Gazette No. 4905, Government Notice No. 62.
CRAN (2012d, April 27). Notice in terms of section 78 of the Communications Act No.8 of 2009. Government Gazette No. 4938, Government Notice No. 109.
CRAN (2012e, February 1). Notice in terms of the regulations regarding licensing procedures for telecommunications and broadcasting service licenses and spectrum use licences. Government Gazette No. 4876, Government Notice No. 28.
CRAN (2012f, November 28). Transfer of control over Powercom (Pty) Ltd (‘Powercom’) trading as Leo to Telecom Namibia Limited (‘Telecom’).
ECTA (2009). Regulatory scorecard 2009. European Competitive Telecommunications Association[ECTA]. Jones Day. SPC Network. Available at http://www.ectaportal.com/en/upload/Scorecards/Regulatory_Scorecard_2009/ECTA_Regulatory_Scorecard_2009_Executive_Summary.pdf
Galpaya, H., & Samarajiva, R. (2009). Measuring effectiveness of telecom regulation using perception surveys. LIRNEasia. Available at http://lirneasia.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/GalpayaSamarajiva_TRE_ITS2009_v5.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1553051
Government Digital Services (2012). Traffic signals. United Kingdom. Available at http://www.direct.gov.uk/prod_consum_dg/groups/dg_digitalassets/@dg/@en/@motor/documents/digitalasset/dg_191933.pdf
Guinea Fowl Investments Two v. Communications Regulatory Authority of Namibia and others, Case No. A 158/2012 (24 September 2012) [unreported].
Gutierrez, L., & Berg, S. (2000). Telecommunications liberalization and regulatory governance: Lessons from Latin America. Telecommunications Policy 24, 865-884. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(00)00069-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(00)00069-0
Intven, H., & McCarthy, T. (2000). Telecommunications regulation handbook. Washington: The World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/0-9697178-7-3
TU (2011a). Measuring the information society 2011. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union [ITU]. Available at http://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/backgrounders/general/pdf/5.pdf
ITU (2011b). ICT regulation toolkit. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union [ITU]. Available at http://www.ictregulationtoolkit.org/en/Section.2093.html
ITU (2012). Measuring the information society 2012. Geneva. International Telecommunication Union [ITU]. Available at http://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/backgrounders/general/pdf/5.pdf
Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D. (2004). The politics of regulation: Institutions and regulatory reforms for the age of governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845420673
Levy, B., & Spiller, P. (1996). A framework for resolving the regulatory problem. In B. Levy & P. Spiller, (Eds.). Regulations, institutions and commitment: Comparative studies of telecommunications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174589
Melody, W. (2001). Telecom reform: Principles, policies and regulatory practices. Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark.
MICT (2009a, February 18). Overarching information communications technology (ICT) policy for the Republic of Namibia 2009. Windhoek: Ministry of Information and Communication Technology [ICT].
MICT (2009b, February 18). Telecommunications policy for the Republic of Namibia 2009. Windhoek: Ministry of ICT.
MICT (2009c, February 18). Broadcasting policy for the Republic of Namibia 2009. Windhoek: Ministry of ICT.
MICT (2010, July 1). Notice of appointment of persons as members of the Board of Communications Regulatory Authority of Namibia: State-Owned Enterprises Governance Act, 2006. Government Gazette No. 4514, Government Notice No. 131.
MICT (2011, November 15). Draft policy on universal access and service in electronic communications. Promoting socio-economic progress in the Republic of Namibia. Windhoek: Ministry of ICT.
MICT (2012, May). Draft universal access and service policy for information and communications technologies. Windhoek: Ministry of ICT (unpublished).
MICT (2013, April 8). General policy guidelines on universal access and service in communications: Communications Act, 2009. Government Gazette No. 5169, Government Notice, No. 82.
Montoya, M., & Trillas, F. (2007). The measurement of the independence of telecommunications regulatory agencies in Latin America and the Caribbean. Utilities Policy 15, 182-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2007.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2007.04.002
MTC (2011). 2010/2011 Annual Report. Available at http://www.mtc.com.na/annual_reports/2011/annual_report_2011.pdf
Mustafa, A. (2002). Benchmarking regulators: Making telecom regulators more effective in the Middle East. Washington: The World Bank Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/11342
NCC (2011, March 15). Amendment of tariffs of mobile operators. Government Gazette No. 4669, Government Notice No. 56.
NEPRU (2007). Switch to competition: Regulatory challenges for Namibia’s telecommunications sector. Policy Brief No. 18. Windhoek: Namibian Economic Policy Research Unit [NEPRU].
NERA (2004). Framework for evaluating the effectiveness of telecommunications regulators in Subsaharan Africa: A final report for the GICT Department of the World Bank. Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTINFORMATIONANDCOMMUNICATIONANDTECHNOLOGIES/Resources/282822-1208273252769/Analytical_Framework_Report_190404.pdf
Neuman, W. (2011). Social research methods. Qualitative and quantitative approaches. 7th edition. Pearson International Edition. USA: Pearson Higher Education.
New Era (2012, February 6). PM tongue-lashes CRAN. Retrieved from http://www.newera.com.na/article.php?articleid=42674&title=KIA%20PTA%20tennis%20series%20ranks%20players
OECD (2014). The governance of regulators: OECD best practice principles for regulatory policy. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264209015-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264209015-en
Republic of Namibia (1991, September 14). Namibian Broadcasting Act No. 9 of 1991. Government Gazette No. 223, Government Notice No. 70.
Republic of Namibia (1992, July 31). Post and Telecommunications Companies Establishment Act 17 of 1992. Government Gazette No. 447, Government Notice No. 91.
Republic of Namibia (2006, September 14). State-owned Enterprises Governance Act No. 2 of 2006. Government Gazette No. 3698, Government Notice No. 149.
Republic of Namibia (2009). Communications Act, No. 8 of 2009. Government Gazette No. 4378, Government Notice No. 226.
Sherbourne, R., & Stork, C. (2010). Namibian telecommunication sector performance review. Towards evidence-based ICT policy and regulation. Volume Two Policy Paper 7, Cape Town: Research ICT Africa.
Smith, W. (1997). Utility regulators: The independence debate. Washington DC: The World Bank. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/11570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/11570
Stern, J., & Holder S. (1999). Regulatory governance: Criteria for assessing the performance of regulatory systems: An application to infrastructure industries in the developing countries of Asia. Utilities Policy, 8(1), 33–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0957-1787(99)00008-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-1787(99)00008-9
Stork, C. (2010). Mobile termination benchmarking: The case of Namibia.Towards Evidence-based ICT Policy and Regulation. Volume Two, Policy Paper 3. Cape Town: Research ICT Africa.
Stork, C. (2011). Universal service baseline study. Unpublished. Tenbücken, M., & Schneider, V. (2004). Divergent convergence: Structures and functions of national regulatory authorities in the telecommunications sector. In J. Jordana & D. Levi-Faur (Eds.). The politics of regulation: Examining regulatory institutions and instruments in the age of governance. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 245-272.
TN (2011). 2010/2011 Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.telecom.na/downloads/reports/2010-11/Annual_Report_2010_2011.pdf
Thompson, C., & Walker, B. (1998). Basics of research (Part 12): Qualitative research. Salt Lake City: University of Utah, College of Nursing.
Waverman, L., & Koutroumpis, P. (2011). Benchmarking telecoms regulation – The Telecommunications Regulatory Governance Index (TRGI). Telecommunications Policy 35, 450-468. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2011.03.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.03.006
WEF (2011a). The global competitiveness report 2011-2012. Geneva: World Economic Forum.WEF (2011b). The Africa competitiveness report 2011. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
WTO (1995). General Agreement on Trade in Services. Retrieved from http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/26-gats.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
- Abstract 348
- pdf 154
.png){kind=spacer}