The Online Visibility of South African Knowledge: Searching for Poverty Alleviation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23962/10539/19274Abstract
This paper reports on an investigation into the online visibility of work undertaken in South Africa in the field of poverty alleviation. An experiment with Google searches was undertaken, motivated by concerns about the visibility of South African research and development work, particularly in a context where social inequality is extreme and poverty such a critical issue. Aware that much attention - through research and the practice of development work - is being paid to poverty alleviation 1 , the authors set out to examine whether that work could be found easily, and what the nature of the search results would be. Significant sums of public money are invested in research, which should result in the production and dissemination of locally generated knowledge as a public good grounded in local realities. A great deal of national and international funding is also spent. Thus, research published online should inform and reflect on national and regional development practice, while contributing perspectives from the South to the global corpus of poverty research. Research to understand poverty and inform the design and targeting of poverty alleviation programmes needs to be freely available and actively shared in order for it to accumulate value. In this regard it is argued that there are exponentially beneficial linkages between research, scholarly publication and social development, which originate with local knowledge production and are amplified by the availability and discoverability of that research. Availability and discoverability add breadth and depth to the potential use, value and impact of the knowledge produced.
References
Abrahams, L., Burke, M., Gray, E., & Rens, A. (2008). Opening access to knowledge in Southern African universities. Study Series 2008, Southern African Regional Universities Association. Retrieved from http://www.sarua.org/?q=publications/opening-access-knowledge-southern-african-universities.
Brinkmann, M. (2009). Why Google search results can be different. Ghacks Technology News. Retrieved from http://www.ghacks.net/2009/09/02/why-google-search-results-can-be-different/.
Casebourne, I., Davies C., Fernandes, M., & Norman, N. (2012). Assessing the accuracy and quality of Wikipedia entries compared to popular online encyclopedias: A comparative preliminary study across disciplines in English, Spanish and Arabic. Retrieved from http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Assessing_the_accuracy_and_quality_of_Wikipedia_entries_compared_to_popular_online_encyclopaedias.
Chan, L., Kirsop, B., & Arunachalam, S. (2011). Towards open and equitable access to research and knowledge for development. PLoS Medicine, 8(3), 4. Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001016
Connaway, L. S., Dickey, T. J., & Radford, M. L. (2011). If it is too inconvenient I’m not going after it: Convenience as a critical factor in information-seeking behaviors. Library Information Science Research, 33(3), 179-190. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2010.12.002
Cutts, M. (2012). How Google works: Algorithms rank relevant results higher in About Search. Google inc. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/competition/howgooglesearchworks.html.
Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation in the Presidency (2012). Development indicators 2011. Retrieved from http://www.thepresidency-dpme.gov.za/dpmewebsite/_admin/Images/ProductDocuments/Development%20Indicators%202011.pdf.
De Satgé, R. (2012). Assessing the need for a poverty information service. Report commissioned for the South African Treasury’s Programme to Support Pro-Poor Policy Development, (unpublished).
Dooley, P. (2010). Wikipedia and the two-faced professoriate. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration WikiSym 10, 153(3), 1. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1832772.1832803
Du Toit, A. (2005). Chronic and structural poverty in South Africa: Challenges for action and research, Centre for Social Science Research UCT, CSSR Working Paper Number 121. Retrieved from http://www.sarpn.org/documents/d0001562/P1912-du-Toit_July2005.pdf.
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2007). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal 22 (2): 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
Giles, J. (2005). Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438(7070), 900-1. Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/438900a
Gray, E., Trotter, H., & Willmers, M. (2012). Scholarly communication in Africa: Aligning strategy and technology for increased visibility of Southern African research. Paper presented at Emerging African ICTD Research: Learning from Africa, at the International Association for Media and Communication Research (IAMCR) 2012 conference at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 16-19 July 2012.
Hamman, R. (2012). Balancing the academic terms of trade: The paradox of publishing in top-tier journals from the periphery, (unpublished).
Hodgson, A. (2012). Special report: Income inequality rising across the globe. Euromonitor International. Retrieved from http://blog.euromonitor.com/2012/03/special-report-income-inequality-rising-across-the-globe.html.
Horton, R. (2003). Medical journals: Evidence of bias against the diseases of poverty. The Lancet, Vol 361, (9539), 712-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12665-7
Jimenez, J., & Santill, X. (2011). Benchmark of annotation of geolocation between Google and Yahoo. 2011 IEEE Electronics Robotics and Automotive Mechanics Conference. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CERMA.2011.38
Knight, C., & Pryke, S. (2012). Wikipedia and the university, a case study. Teaching in Higher Education, (March), 1-11. Routledge. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.666734
Laurent, M., & Vickers, T. (2009). Seeking health information online: Does Wikipedia matter? Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association,16(4), 471-479. American Medical Informatics Association. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M3059
Levy, S. (2010). How Google’s algorithm rules the Web. Wired Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/02/ff_google_algorithm/.
Lewandowski, D., & Spree, U. (2011). Ranking of Wikipedia articles in search engines revisited: Fair ranking for reasonable quality? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 62(1), 117-132. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M3059
Liebrandt, M., Woolard, I., Finne A., & Argent, J. (2010). Trends in South African income distribution and poverty since the fall of apartheid. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.npconline.co.za/MediaLib/Downloads/Home/Tabs/Diagnostic/Economy2/Trends%20in%20South%20African%20Income%20Distribution%20and%20Poverty%20since%20the%20Fall%20of%20Apartheid.pdf.
Lim, S. (2009). How and why do college students use Wikipedia? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 60(11), 2189-2202. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21142
Mbeki, T. (2008). State of the Nation address of the President of South Africa, Thabo Mbeki: Joint Sitting of Parliament, 8 February 2008, The South African Presidency, Retrieved from http://www.info.gov.za/speeches/2008/08020811021001.htm.
Mokomele-Mothibi, M. (2012). MEC report to National NPO Summit, Presentation, Department of Social Development, Retrieved from http://www.dsd.gov.za/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc.
Nicholas, D., Clark, D., Rowlands, I., & Jamali, H. (2009). Online use and information seeking behaviour: Institutional and subject comparisons of researchers. Journal of Information Science, 35(6), 660-676. Sage Publications, Inc. Retrieved from http://jis.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0165551509338341.
Nyamnjoh, F. (2010). Open Access and open knowledge production. The African Journal of Information and Communication 10: 67-72, Retrieved from http://link.wits.ac.za/journal/AJIC10-Nyamnjoh.pdf.
O’Dell, J. (2012). What Google+ means for Facebook. Mashable. Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2011/03/31/googles-plus-1-and-facebook/.
Okoli, C., Mehdi, M., Mesgari, M., Nielsen, F., & Lanamäki, A. (2012). The people’s encyclopedia under the gaze of the sages: A systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia. Social Science Research Network. SSRN. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/paper=2021326.
Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Lorigo, L., Gay, G., & Granka, L. (2007). In Google we trust: Users’ decisions on rank, position, and relevance. (S. C. Herring, Ed.) Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 801-823. USC Annenberg School for Communication. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue3/pan.html.
Park, T. (2011). The visibility of Wikipedia in scholarly publications. First Monday, 16(8), 26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00351.x
Shackleton, C., Shackleton, S., Buite, E., & Bird. N. (2007). The importance of dry woodlands and forests in rural livelihoods and poverty alleviation in South Africa. Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 558-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.004
Simpson, T. (2012). Evaluating Google as a epistemic tool. Metaphilosophy 43, 426–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01759.x
Waller, V. (2011). Not just information: Who searches for what on the search engine Google? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 62(4), 761-775. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21492
Walters, W. (2011). Comparative recall and precision of simple and expert searches in Google Scholar and eight other databases, libraries and the Academy. Portal Libraries and the Academy 11 (4) 971–1006. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.0042
Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2011). Wikipedia, past and present: 42% of all Americans turn to the popular collaborative encyclopedia for information online. PEW Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2011/PIP_Wikipedia.pdf.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
- Abstract 169
- pdf 99